American Journal of Audiology Vol.8 47-56 June 1999. doi:10.1044/1059-0889(1999/002)
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrowCustom Print
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Turner, C. W.
Right arrow Articles by Cummings, K. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Turner, C. W.
Right arrow Articles by Cummings, K. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Delicious   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Speech Audibility for Listeners With High-Frequency Hearing Loss

Christopher W. Turner 1 and Karolyn J. Cummings

1 The University of Iowa, Iowa City

This study investigated whether there are limitations on the benefit of providing audible speech information to listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. In a group of 10 listeners with various degrees of high-frequency hearing loss, speech recognition was tested across a wide range of presentation levels. For each of these listeners with hearing loss, recognition performance reached an asymptote of <100%. When the spectrum of the speech for this asymptotic performance level was compared with the listener's pure-tone thresholds, it was seen that providing audible speech to high-frequency regions (ge3000 Hz), where hearing loss exceeds 55 dB HL, tended to produce little or no improvement in recognition scores. In contrast, providing audible speech to lower frequency regions for a listener with a flat, severe-to-profound hearing loss did show improvement with increasing speech audibility, despite this listener's thresholds being greater than 55 dB HL. The present study adds further support to the idea that attempting to provide amplification to regions with severe high-frequency hearing loss (ge3000 Hz) may not necessarily benefit many individuals with hearing loss.

Key Words: hearing loss, amplification, speech

Submitted on December 19, 1997
Accepted on February 3, 1999


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AJAHome page
C. M. Roup and C. M. Noe
Hearing Aid Outcomes for Listeners With High-Frequency Hearing Loss
Am J Audiol, June 1, 2009; 18(1): 45 - 52.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
A. R. Horwitz, J. B. Ahlstrom, and J. R. Dubno
Factors Affecting the Benefits of High-Frequency Amplification
J Speech Lang Hear Res, June 1, 2008; 51(3): 798 - 813.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
T. A. Ricketts, A. B. Dittberner, and E. E. Johnson
High-Frequency Amplification and Sound Quality in Listeners With Normal Through Moderate Hearing Loss
J Speech Lang Hear Res, February 1, 2008; 51(1): 160 - 172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AJAHome page
P. N. Plyler, S. G. Madix, J. W. Thelin, and K. W. Johnston
Contribution of High-Frequency Information to the Acceptance of Background Noise in Listeners With Normal and Impaired Hearing
Am J Audiol, December 1, 2007; 16(2): 149 - 156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
R. H. Gifford, M. F. Dorman, A. J. Spahr, and S. A. McKarns
Effect of Digital Frequency Compression (DFC) on Speech Recognition in Candidates for Combined Electric and Acoustic Stimulation (EAS)
J Speech Lang Hear Res, October 1, 2007; 50(5): 1194 - 1202.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
N. E. Amos and L. E. Humes
Contribution of High Frequencies to Speech Recognition in Quiet and Noise in Listeners With Varying Degrees of High-Frequency Sensorineural Hearing Loss
J Speech Lang Hear Res, August 1, 2007; 50(4): 819 - 834.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
R. H. Gifford, M. F. Dorman, S. A. McKarns, and A. J. Spahr
Combined Electric and Contralateral Acoustic Hearing: Word and Sentence Recognition With Bimodal Hearing
J Speech Lang Hear Res, August 1, 2007; 50(4): 835 - 843.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
P. N. Plyler and E. L. Fleck
The Effects of High-Frequency Amplification on the Objective and Subjective Performance of Hearing Instrument Users With Varying Degrees of High-Frequency Hearing Loss
J Speech Lang Hear Res, June 1, 2006; 49(3): 616 - 627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
TRENDS AMPLIFHome page
B. C. J. Moore
Dead Regions in the Cochlea: Diagnosis, Perceptual Consequences, and Implications for the Fitting of Hearing Aids
Trends in Amplification, March 1, 2001; 5(1): 1 - 34.
[PDF]