American Journal of Audiology Vol.7 55-60 October 1998. doi:10.1044/1059-0889(1998/014)
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrowCustom Print
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roup, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Stoppenbach, D. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Roup, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Stoppenbach, D. T.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Delicious   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Tympanometric Screening Norms for Adults

Christina M. Roup 1, Terry L. Wiley 1, Staci H. Safady 1, and Daniel T. Stoppenbach 1

1 University of Wisconsin-Madison

cmroup{at}students.wisc.edu

The purpose of this study was to reexamine the Margolis and Heller (1987) normative tympanometric data (also American Speech-Language-Hearing [ASHA], 1990 interim norms) using a strict control over subject age and gender. Normative values for peak, compensated static acoustic admittance (Peak Ytm), acoustic equivalent volume (Vea), and tympanometric width (TW) were determined for 102 young adults with normal hearing. Relative to the Margolis and Heller normative values, significant differences were found for Vea and TW. Although statistically significant, these differences were small and of little clinical importance. However, significant and clinically important gender differences in young adults were observed for each of the tympanometric measures. Compared to males, females had lower Peak Ytm values, smaller Vea values, and higher TW values.

Key Words: tympanometry, middle ear, admittance, immittance, screening

Submitted on June 22, 1997
Accepted on March 4, 1998


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 JSLHRHome page
S. Gordon-Salant and S. A. Friedman
Recognition of Rapid Speech by Blind and Sighted Older Adults
J Speech Lang Hear Res, April 1, 2011; 54(2): 622 - 631.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JSLHRHome page
J. H. Horn, S. R. Pratt, and J. D. Durrant
Parameters to Maximize 2f2-f1 Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission Levels
J Speech Lang Hear Res, December 1, 2008; 51(6): 1620 - 1629.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 AJAHome page
S. L. Nissen, R. W. Harris, and A. Dukes
Word Recognition Materials for Native Speakers of Taiwan Mandarin
Am J Audiol, June 1, 2008; 17(1): 68 - 79.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Otolaryngol Head Neck SurgHome page
Y. Firat, A. Kizilay, M. Akarcay, A. Yucel, K. But, and S. Yologlu
The Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Middle Ear Pressure
Otolaryngology -- Head and Neck Surgery, August 1, 2007; 137(2): 218 - 223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 TRENDS AMPLIFHome page
K. L. Tremblay, L. Kalstein, C. J. Billings, and P. E. Souza
The Neural Representation of Consonant-Vowel Transitions in Adults Who Wear Hearing Aids
Trends in Amplification, September 1, 2006; 10(3): 155 - 162.
[Abstract] [PDF]