American Journal of Audiology Vol.18 24-33 June 2009. doi:10.1044/1059-0889(2008/08-0015)
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CEUs available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrowCustom Print
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spivak, L.
Right arrow Articles by Gershkovich, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Spivak, L.
Right arrow Articles by Gershkovich, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Delicious   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Newborn Hearing Screening Follow-Up: Factors Affecting Hearing Aid Fitting by 6 Months of Age

Lynn Spivak, Heidi Sokol, Charles Auerbach and Stella Gershkovich

Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, NY

Contact author: Lynn Spivak, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Hearing and Speech Center, 430 Lakeville Road, New Hyde Park, NY 11042. E-mail: spivak{at}lij.edu.

Purpose: To determine the extent to which the goal of hearing aid fitting by 6 months of age is being achieved and to identify barriers to achieving that goal.

Method: Screening and follow-up records from 114,121 infants born at 6 hospitals were collected over a 6-year period. Infants diagnosed with permanent hearing loss requiring amplification were categorized as fit on time, fit late, or lost to follow-up. Seven factors were empirically identified as potential barriers to timely intervention.

Results: Ninety-one percent of referred infants returned for follow-up evaluation. Hearing aids were fit on 107 of the 192 infants requiring amplification. Thirty-nine percent were fit on time, and 61% were fit late or lost to follow-up. Unilateral hearing loss and late diagnosis were statistically significant (p < .0001) predictors for late fitting and loss to follow-up. Conductive hearing loss and coverage by Medicaid were also statistically significant (p < .0001) predictors for loss to follow-up.

Conclusion: High return rate for follow-up does not ensure hearing aid fitting by 6 months of age. Infants with unilateral hearing loss are at particular risk of being lost to follow-up.

Key Words: newborn hearing screening, hearing aids, early hearing detection and intervention


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AJAHome page
L. Holte, E. Walker, J. Oleson, M. Spratford, M. P. Moeller, P. Roush, H. Ou, and J. B. Tomblin
Factors Influencing Follow-Up to Newborn Hearing Screening for Infants Who Are Hard of Hearing
Am J Audiol, December 1, 2012; 21(2): 163 - 174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Deaf Stud Deaf EducHome page
M. VanDam, S. E. Ambrose, and M. P. Moeller
Quantity of Parental Language in the Home Environments of Hard-of-Hearing 2-Year-Olds
J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., October 1, 2012; 17(4): 402 - 420.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AJAHome page
R. Larsen, K. Munoz, J. DesGeorges, L. Nelson, and S. Kennedy
Early Hearing Detection and Intervention: Parent Experiences With the Diagnostic Hearing Assessment
Am J Audiol, June 1, 2012; 21(1): 91 - 99.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
K. C. Deem, E. A. Diaz-Ordaz, and B. Shiner
Identifying Quality Improvement Opportunities in a Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Program
Pediatrics, January 1, 2012; 129(1): e157 - e164.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
A. R. Kemper, W. T. Mahle, G. R. Martin, W. C. Cooley, P. Kumar, W. R. Morrow, K. Kelm, G. D. Pearson, J. Glidewell, S. D. Grosse, et al.
Strategies for Implementing Screening for Critical Congenital Heart Disease
Pediatrics, November 1, 2011; 128(5): e1259 - e1267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
S. J. Limb, M. A. McManus, H. B. Fox, K. R. White, and I. Forsman
Ensuring Financial Access to Hearing Aids for Infants and Young Children
Pediatrics, August 1, 2010; 126(Supplement_1): s43 - s51.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AJAHome page
A. A. Taha, S. R. Pratt, T. M. Farahat, G. M. Abdel-Rasoul, M. A. Albtanony, A.-L. E. Elrashiedy, H. R. Alwakeel, and A. Zein
Prevalence and Risk Factors of Hearing Impairment Among Primary-School Children in Shebin El-Kom District, Egypt
Am J Audiol, June 1, 2010; 19(1): 46 - 60.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]