|
|
||||||||
1 Auditory Processing Service, Prairie Village, KS
2 State University of New York at Fredonia
tillery{at}fredonia.edu
For the past 10 years, Cacace and McFarland have contended that current central auditory processing tests are invalid because they cannot disassociate central auditory processing disorder (CAPD) from language, attention, and other problems. Over this period of time, they have not developed a battery of tests to compare with the current procedures, so the question cannot be resolved in a proper scientific fashion. Also, we disagree with their contention and demonstrate that an experienced audiologist, under double-blind research conditions, can reliably evaluate individuals with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder for CAPD, whether therapeutically controlled for attention with Ritalin or taking a placebo. Further, we show how intra- and intertest comparisons, as well as a team approach, disassociate CAPD from potential contamination from supramodal factors.
Submitted on September 8, 2005
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. J. Brannen Expand Your Practice: Add (Central) Auditory Processing Services Perspectives on Audiology, August 1, 2008; 4(1): 4 - 8. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Johnstone Toward Evidence-Based Practice in the Auditory Processing Disorder Clinic Perspectives on Audiology, August 1, 2008; 4(1): 9 - 14. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. DeBonis and D. Moncrieff Auditory Processing Disorders: An Update for Speech-Language Pathologists Am J Speech Lang Pathol, February 1, 2008; 17(1): 4 - 18. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Jutras, M. Loubert, J.-L. Dupuis, C. Marcoux, V. Dumont, and M. Baril Applicability of Central Auditory Processing Disorder Models Am J Audiol, December 1, 2007; 16(2): 100 - 106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASHA Journals | AJA | AJSLP | JSLHR | LSHSS |