AJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Audiology Vol.8 83-92 December 1999. doi:10.1044/1059-0889(1999/014)
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haggard, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Primus, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Haggard, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Primus, M. A.

Parental Perceptions of Hearing Loss Classification in Children

Rebecca S. Haggard 1 and Michael A. Primus 1

1 University of Wyoming, Laramie

mprimus{at}uwyo.edu

Hearing loss classification scales are commonly used to explain audiometric findings to the parents of children with hearing loss. These scales, however, have little or no scientific basis. In this study, filtered auditory recordings were used to simulate three levels of childhood hearing loss, as defined by the commonly used terms—slight, mild, and moderate. Parents, after listening to each simulation, were asked to provide their impressions. Results demonstrated that: parents defined each simulated loss with terminology representing substantially greater magnitude than the commonly used terms; parents anticipated significantly greater difficulty (p < .05) for each of nine hearing-related tasks when hearing loss was defined by the simulations rather than the classification terms; and parents selected more aggressive management procedures in response to the simulations than to the classification terms. In an additional task, parents estimated degree of simulated hearing loss with percentage values, indicating about 40% greater hearing loss for the three levels of loss compared to values produced by the conventional American Academy of Otolaryngology-American Council of Otolaryngology (1979) percentage formula. The findings indicate that standard methods of classifying hearing loss in audiologic and medical clinics may undermine parents' understanding of their child's hearing loss, causing them to underestimate substantially the magnitude of the loss.

Key Words: hearing loss, pediatric, counseling, classification terms

Submitted on October 16, 1998
Accepted on May 13, 1999




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
TRENDS AMPLIFHome page
D. S. Ross, W. J. Holstrum, M. Gaffney, D. Green, R. F. Oyler, and J. S. Gravel
Hearing Screening and Diagnostic Evaluation of Children With Unilateral and Mild Bilateral Hearing Loss
Trends in Amplification, March 1, 2008; 12(1): 27 - 34.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
TRENDS AMPLIFHome page
W. J. Holstrum, M. Gaffney, J. S. Gravel, R. F. Oyler, and D. S. Ross
Early Intervention for Children With Unilateral and Mild Bilateral Degrees of Hearing Loss
Trends in Amplification, March 1, 2008; 12(1): 35 - 41.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.