AJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Audiology Vol.7 45-49 October 1998. doi:10.1044/1059-0889(1998/013)
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pynchon, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Herr, D. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Pynchon, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Herr, D. G.

Area-Under-the-Curve Measure of the Auditory Middle Latency Response (AMLR) From Birth to Early Adulthood

Kara A. Pynchon 1, Denise A. Tucker 1, Roger A. Ruth 2, Katherine A. Barrett 1, and David G. Herr 1

1 University of North Carolina - Greensboro
2 University of Virginia

datucker{at}hamlet.uncg.edu

The area-under-the-curve (AUC) measure of the auditory middle latency response (AMLR) waveform was derived and analyzed from recordings in 50 subjects with normal hearing. The AUC metric is believed to represent the total amount of neural energy contributing to the evoked response. This proposed method of measure, therefore, may provide an alternative method of quantifying the response. The subjects were divided into five age groups (n = 10 for each group): infants, children, preteens, teens, and adults. Ipsilateral and contralateral recordings of the AMLR were obtained at two stimulus levels (70 and 40 dB nHL) and at two stimulus rates (11.3 and 3.3/s). AUC measures were obtained for each recording at 70 and 40 dB nHL and at 3.3 and 11.3 clicks/s. These area measurements were compared among the five age groups for significant differences due to age. According to the results, no significant differences in the AUC of the AMLR waveform existed as a function of age.

Key Words: area under the curve, AMLR, auditory evoked responses

Submitted on September 16, 1996
Accepted on February 19, 1998







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.