AJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Audiology Vol.6 49-54 July 1997.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Searchfield, G. D.
Right arrow Articles by Purdy, S. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Searchfield, G. D.
Right arrow Articles by Purdy, S. C.

Probe Microphone Placement for Real Ear Measurement

Update on a Simple Acoustic Method

Grant D. Searchfield 1 and Suzanne C. Purdy 1

1 The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

g.searchfield{at}auckland.ac.nz

Probe microphone measurement systems allow determination of sound pressure level (SPL) within the external auditory meatus (EAM). EAM geometry and middle ear impedance contribute significantly to the acoustic properties of the EAM, and consequently sound pressure distribution along the EAM is not uniform. Accurate measurement of SPL at the tympanic membrane (TM) requires probe microphone placement within 6 to 8 mm of the TM. A method of probe placement using the acoustical properties of the EAM (Sullivan, 1988) was investigated in 6 adults. Sullivan's acoustic probe placement method was found to overestimate probe distance from the TM, but with minor modification the acoustic method could be used to place the probe so that real ear measurements accurately predicted SPL at the TM. The difference between TM SPL and SPL at probe position was compared for the acoustic method and a constant insertion depth (25 mm) method. More accurate estimates of TM SPL were obtained with the acoustic method.

Key Words: probe microphone, external auditory meatus, acoustic placement method

Submitted on November 20, 1996
Accepted on May 23, 1997







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.