AJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Audiology Vol.5 52-56 November 1996.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sinclair, S. T.
Right arrow Articles by Stelmachowicz, P. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Sinclair, S. T.
Right arrow Articles by Stelmachowicz, P. G.

Repeatability of a Real-Ear-to-Coupler Difference Measurement as a Function of Age

Sheila T. Sinclair 1, Kathryn L. Beauchaine 2, K. Shane Moodie 1, Judith A. Feigin 2, Richard C. Seewald 1, and Patricia G. Stelmachowicz 2

1 The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario
2 Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, NE

For a given individual, the applicability of an average real-ear-to-coupler transfer function in the fitting of hearing aids is of limited utility, because the acoustical properties of individual ears may differ substantially from average transformation values (Feigin, Kopun, Stelmachowicz, & Gorga, 1989; Fikret-Pasa & Revit, 1992). It has been suggested, therefore, that individual real-ear-to-coupler difference (RECD) measures should be obtained whenever possible and applied within the fitting process (Hawkins, 1992; Nelson Barlow, Auslander, Rines, & Stelmachowicz, 1988). The purpose of this study was to investigate the repeatability of a specific RECD measurement procedure that has been developed for clinical application with young children (Moodie, Seewald, & Sinclair, 1994). The test-retest reliability of this procedure is reported for 10 adults and 90 children in the birth-to-7-year age range.

Key Words: pediatric, amplification, hearing aid

Submitted on July 24, 1995
Accepted on February 14, 1996




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
TRENDS AMPLIFHome page
M. Bagatto, S. Moodie, S. Scollie, R. Seewald, S. Moodie, J. Pumford, and K. P. R. Liu
Clinical Protocols for Hearing Instrument Fitting in the Desired Sensation Level Method
Trends in Amplification, December 1, 2005; 9(4): 199 - 226.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
TRENDS AMPLIFHome page
R. C. Seewald and S. D. Scollie
An Approach for Ensuring Accuracy in Pediatric Hearing Instrument Fitting
Trends in Amplification, March 1, 2003; 7(1): 29 - 40.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.