AJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

American Journal of Audiology Vol.4 36-48 November 1995.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McFarland, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Cacace, A. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by McFarland, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Cacace, A. T.

Modality Specificity as a Criterion for Diagnosing Central Auditory Processing Disorders

Dennis J. McFarland 1 and Anthony T. Cacace 2

1 Wadsworth Center for Laboratories and Research, New York State Health Department, Albany, NY
2 Albany Medical College, Albany, NY

A central "auditory" processing disorder (CAPD) is an auditory perceptual dysfunction that cannot be explained on the basis of peripheral hearing loss. As a concept, CAPD has not been completely validated, and many issues continue to be controversial. A primary issue of concern is whether currently used tests to evaluate CAPD are sensitive to factors that are not of an auditory perceptual nature. In this paper, we consider the case for modality specificity as a criterion for improving the specificity of diagnosing CAPD. Demonstrating the modality-specific nature of sensory processing deficits is one way to rule out nonperceptual factors as explanations for observed dysfunction.

Key Words: central auditory processing, perceptual disorders, attention, dichotic listening, temporal processing

Submitted on August 18, 1994
Accepted on October 28, 1994




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 AJAHome page
B. Jutras, M. Loubert, J.-L. Dupuis, C. Marcoux, V. Dumont, and M. Baril
Applicability of Central Auditory Processing Disorder Models
Am J Audiol, December 1, 2007; 16(2): 100 - 106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JSLHRHome page
A. A. Zekveld, E. L. J. George, S. E. Kramer, S. T. Goverts, and T. Houtgast
The Development of the Text Reception Threshold Test: A Visual Analogue of the Speech Reception Threshold Test
J Speech Lang Hear Res, June 1, 2007; 50(3): 576 - 584.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JSLHRHome page
L. E. Humes, M. H. Burk, M. P. Coughlin, T. A. Busey, and L. E. Strauser
Auditory Speech Recognition and Visual Text Recognition in Younger and Older Adults: Similarities and Differences Between Modalities and the Effects of Presentation Rate
J Speech Lang Hear Res, April 1, 2007; 50(2): 283 - 303.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Communication Disorders QuarterlyHome page
R. J. Kruger, J. J. Kruger, R. Hugo, and N. G. Campbell
Relationship Patterns Between Central Auditory Processing Disorders and Language Disorders, Learning Disabilities, and Sensory Integration Dysfunction
Communication Disorders Quarterly, January 1, 2001; 22(2): 87 - 98.
[Abstract] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.