AJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Audiology Vol.16 130-144 December 2007. doi:10.1044/1059-0889(2007/017)
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CEUs available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ricketts, T.
Right arrow Articles by Tharpe, A. M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ricketts, T.
Right arrow Articles by Tharpe, A. M.

Research and Technology | Article

Directional Benefit in Simulated Classroom Environments

Todd Ricketts and Jason Galster

Dan Maddox Hearing Aid Research Laboratory, and Bill Wilkerson Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN

Anne Marie Tharpe

Bill Wilkerson Center, Vanderbilt University

Contact author: Todd A. Ricketts, Dan Maddox Hearing Aid Research Laboratory, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, 1215 21st Avenue South, Room 8310, Medical Center East, South Tower, Nashville, TN 37232-8242. E-mail: todd.a.ricketts{at}vanderbilt.edu.

Purpose: To examine speech recognition performance and subjective ratings for directional and omnidirectional microphone modes across a variety of simulated classroom environments.

Method: Speech recognition was measured in a group of 26 children age 10–17 years in up to 8 listening environments.

Results: Significant directional benefit was found when the sound source(s) of interest was in front, and directional decrement was measured when the sound source of interest was behind the participants. Of considerable interest is that a directional decrement was observed in the absence of directional benefit when sources of interest were both in front of and behind the participants. In addition, limiting directional processing to the low frequencies eliminated both the directional deficit and the directional advantage.

Conclusions: Although these data support the use of directional hearing aids in some noisy school environments, they also suggest that use of the directional mode should be limited to situations in which all talkers of interest are located in the front hemisphere. These results highlight the importance of appropriate switching between microphone modes in the school-age population.

Key Words: directional microphones, hearing aids, children




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JSLHRHome page
T. A. Ricketts and J. Galster
Head Angle and Elevation in Classroom Environments: Implications for Amplification
J Speech Lang Hear Res, April 1, 2008; 51(2): 516 - 525.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.