AJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

American Journal of Audiology Vol.16 100-106 December 2007. doi:10.1044/1059-0889(2007/014)
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jutras, B.
Right arrow Articles by Baril, M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jutras, B.
Right arrow Articles by Baril, M.

Research and Technology | Paper

Applicability of Central Auditory Processing Disorder Models

Benoît Jutras

Université de Montréal, and Sainte-Justine Hospital Pediatric Research Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Monique Loubert and Jean-Luc Dupuis

Institut Raymond-Dewar, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Caroline Marcoux

Centre de readaptation InterVal, Trois-Rivieres, Quebec, Canada

Véronique Dumont

Institut Raymond-Dewar

Michèle Baril

Université de Montréal

Contact author: Benoît Jutras, School of Speech Pathology and Audiology, University of Montreal, P.O. Box 6128, Downtown Station, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3C 3J7. E-mail: benoit.jutras{at}umontreal.ca.

Purpose: Central auditory processing disorder ([C]APD) is a relatively recent construct that has given rise to 2 theoretical models: the Buffalo Model and the Bellis/Ferre Model. These models describe 4 and 5 (C)APD categories, respectively. The present study examines the applicability of these models to clinical practice. Neither of these models was based on data from peer-reviewed sources.

Method: This is a retrospective study that reviewed 178 records of children diagnosed with (C)APD, of which 48 were retained for analysis.

Results: More than 80% of the children could be classified into one of the Buffalo Model categories, while more than 90% remained unclassified under the Bellis/Ferre Model. This discrepancy can be explained by the fact that the classification of the Buffalo Model is based primarily on a single central auditory test (Staggered Spondaic Word), whereas the Bellis/Ferre Model classification uses a combination of auditory test results.

Conclusion: The 2 models provide a conceptual framework for (C)APD, but they must be further refined to be fully applicable in clinical settings.

Key Words: central auditory processing disorder, hearing disorders






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.