AJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Audiology Vol.14 3-13 June 2005. doi:10.1044/1059-0889(2005/002)
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harris, P. K.
Right arrow Articles by Moravec, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Harris, P. K.
Right arrow Articles by Moravec, J.

The Use of Tympanometry and Pneumatic Otoscopy for Predicting Middle Ear Disease

Paula K. Harris 1, Kathleen M. Hutchinson 2, and Joseph Moravec 3

1 Midwest Ear, Nose and Throat Clinic, Herrin, IL
2 Miami University, Oxford, OH
3 Joseph J. Moravec, Inc., Facial Surgery Center, Cincinnati, OH

hutchik{at}muohio.edu

Purpose: Otitis media is the most common condition diagnosed by pediatricians and is estimated to affect approximately 70% of the pediatric population. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of otoscopy and multifrequency tympanometry (MFT) for diagnosis of otitis media in children.

Method: Twenty-one children, age 1 to 10 years, who were seeking medical treatment for suspected middle ear disease were selected to participate. Data were collected prior to myringotomy to determine the sensitivity and specificity rates of the following otologic and audiologic measures: (a) pneumatic otoscopy, (b) conventional tympanometry, and (c) MFT. For this study, the "gold standard," myringotomy, was used along with pneumatic otoscopy to determine the effectiveness, sensitivity, and specificity of conventional 226-Hz tympanometry, 678-Hz tympanometry, and 1000-Hz tympanometry to predict middle ear disease.

Results: The diagnoses provided with pneumatic otoscopy and tympanometry were both similar, agreeing in diagnosis 80%–100% of the time. The diagnoses from 678-Hz and 1000-Hz tympanometry were nearly equal and proved to detect abnormality at a higher rate.

Conclusions: MFT is recommended on a routine basis with children having a history of otitis media, or else abnormal or notched 226-Hz tympanograms. Further research with a larger sample size will illuminate the possible predictive potential of MFT in otitis media.

Key Words: multifrequency tympanometry, conventional tympanometry, pneumatic otoscopy

Submitted on August 15, 2004
Revised on January 22, 2005
Accepted on April 28, 2005







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.