AJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Audiology Vol.11 65-71 December 2002. doi:10.1044/1059-0889(2002/009)
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Knecht, H. A.
Right arrow Articles by Feth, L. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Knecht, H. A.
Right arrow Articles by Feth, L. L.

Background Noise Levels and Reverberation Times in Unoccupied Classrooms

Predictions and Measurements

Heather A. Knecht 1, Peggy B. Nelson 2, Gail M. Whitelaw 1, and Lawrence L. Feth 1

1 The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
2 University of Maryland, Baltimore

Classrooms are often filled with deterrents that hamper a child's ability to listen and learn. It is evident that the acoustical environment in classrooms can be one such deterrent. Excessive background noise and reverberation can affect the achievement and educational performance of children with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and children with normal hearing sensitivity who have other auditory learning difficulties, as well as elementary school children with no verbal or hearing disabilities. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the extent of the problem of noise and reverberation in schools. To that end, we measured reverberation times and background noise levels in 32 different unoccupied elementary classrooms in eight public school buildings in central Ohio. The results were compared with the limits recommended in the American National Standards Institute standard for acoustical characteristics of classrooms in the United States (ANSI S12.60-2002). These measurements were also compared to the external and internal criteria variables developed by Crandell, Smaldino, & Flexer (1995) to determine if a simple checklist can accurately predict unwanted classroom background noise levels and reverberation. Results indicated that most classrooms were not in compliance with ANSI noise and reverberation standards. Further, our results suggested that a checklist was not a good predictor of the noisier and more reverberant rooms.

Key Words: classroom acoustics, noise, reverberation, educational audiology

Submitted on November 12, 2001
Accepted on August 12, 2002




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JSLHRHome page
S. Choi, A. Lotto, D. Lewis, B. Hoover, and P. Stelmachowicz
Attentional Modulation of Word Recognition by Children in a Dual-Task Paradigm
J Speech Lang Hear Res, August 1, 2008; 51(4): 1042 - 1054.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
R. F. Holt and A. E. Carney
Developmental Effects of Multiple Looks in Speech Sound Discrimination
J Speech Lang Hear Res, December 1, 2007; 50(6): 1404 - 1424.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AJAHome page
E. C. Schafer and L. M. Thibodeau
Speech Recognition in Noise in Children With Cochlear Implants While Listening in Bilateral, Bimodal, and FM-System Arrangements
Am J Audiol, December 1, 2006; 15(2): 114 - 126.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.