© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
Background Noise Levels and Reverberation Times in Unoccupied Classrooms
Predictions and Measurements
1 The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
2 University of Maryland, Baltimore
Classrooms are often filled with deterrents that hamper a child's ability to listen and learn. It is evident that the acoustical environment in classrooms can be one such deterrent. Excessive background noise and reverberation can affect the achievement and educational performance of children with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and children with normal hearing sensitivity who have other auditory learning difficulties, as well as elementary school children with no verbal or hearing disabilities. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the extent of the problem of noise and reverberation in schools. To that end, we measured reverberation times and background noise levels in 32 different unoccupied elementary classrooms in eight public school buildings in central Ohio. The results were compared with the limits recommended in the American National Standards Institute standard for acoustical characteristics of classrooms in the United States (ANSI S12.60-2002). These measurements were also compared to the external and internal criteria variables developed by Crandell, Smaldino, & Flexer (1995) to determine if a simple checklist can accurately predict unwanted classroom background noise levels and reverberation. Results indicated that most classrooms were not in compliance with ANSI noise and reverberation standards. Further, our results suggested that a checklist was not a good predictor of the noisier and more reverberant rooms.
Key Words: classroom acoustics, noise, reverberation, educational audiology
Submitted on November 12, 2001
Accepted on August 12, 2002
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Delicious 
Digg 
Facebook 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  R. W. McCreery, R. A. Venediktov, J. J. Coleman, and H. M. Leech An Evidence-Based Systematic Review of Directional Microphones and Digital Noise Reduction Hearing Aids in School-Age Children With Hearing Loss Am J Audiol, December 1, 2012; 21(2): 295 - 312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. L. Pinkoski-Ball, J. Reichle, and B. Munson Synthesized Speech Intelligibility and Early Preschool-Age Children: Comparing Accuracy for Single-Word Repetition With Repeated Exposure Am J Speech Lang Pathol, November 1, 2012; 21(4): 293 - 301. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. J. Shalkouhi Room Modes With Regard to Speech Intelligibility in Classrooms: Comments on Knecht et al. (2002) Am J Audiol, December 1, 2010; 19(2): 139 - 141. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. L. Feth, P. B. Nelson, R. D. Godfrey, and G. M. Whitelaw Room modes with regard to speech intelligibility in classrooms: response to shalkouhi (2010). Am J Audiol, December 1, 2010; 19(2): 142 - 142. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L.-F. Shi Perception of Acoustically Degraded Sentences in Bilingual Listeners Who Differ in Age of English Acquisition J Speech Lang Hear Res, August 1, 2010; 53(4): 821 - 835. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Choi, A. Lotto, D. Lewis, B. Hoover, and P. Stelmachowicz Attentional Modulation of Word Recognition by Children in a Dual-Task Paradigm J Speech Lang Hear Res, August 1, 2008; 51(4): 1042 - 1054. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. F. Holt and A. E. Carney Developmental Effects of Multiple Looks in Speech Sound Discrimination J Speech Lang Hear Res, December 1, 2007; 50(6): 1404 - 1424. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. C. Schafer and L. M. Thibodeau Speech Recognition in Noise in Children With Cochlear Implants While Listening in Bilateral, Bimodal, and FM-System Arrangements Am J Audiol, December 1, 2006; 15(2): 114 - 126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|