AJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

American Journal of Audiology Vol.11 124-127 December 2002. doi:10.1044/1059-0889(2002/013)
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shannon, R. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shannon, R. V.

The Relative Importance of Amplitude, Temporal, and Spectral Cues for Cochlear Implant Processor Design

Robert V. Shannon 1

1 House Ear Institute, Los Angeles, CA

Shannon{at}hei.org

Speech understanding with cochlear implants has improved steadily over the last 25 years, and the success of implants has provided a powerful tool for understanding speech recognition in general. Comparing speech recognition in normal-hearing listeners and in cochlear-implant listeners has revealed many important lessons about the types of information necessary for good speech recognition—and some of the lessons are surprising. This paper presents a summary of speech perception research over the last 25 years with cochlear-implant and normal-hearing listeners. As long as the speech is audible, even the relatively severe amplitude distortion has only a mild effect on intelligibility. Temporal cues appear to be useful for speech intelligibility only up to about 20 Hz. Whereas temporal information above 20 Hz may contribute to improved quality, it contributes little to speech understanding. In contrast, the quantity and quality of spectral information appear to be critical for speech understanding. Only four spectral "channels" of information can produce good speech understanding, but more channels are required for difficult listening situations. Speech understanding is sensitive to the placement of spectral information along the cochlea. In prosthetic devices, in which the spectral information can be delivered to any cochlear location, it is critical to present spectral information to the normal acoustic tonotopic location for that information. If there is a shift or distortion of 2 to 3 mm between frequency and cochlear place, speech recognition is decreased dramatically.

Key Words: cochlear implants, speech recognition

Submitted on September 9, 2002
Accepted on November 26, 2002




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
B. J. Malone, B. H. Scott, and M. N. Semple
Dynamic Amplitude Coding in the Auditory Cortex of Awake Rhesus Macaques
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2007; 98(3): 1451 - 1474.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JSLHRHome page
H. Lane, M. Denny, F. H. Guenther, H. M. Hanson, N. Marrone, M. L. Matthies, J. S. Perkell, E. Stockmann, M. Tiede, J. Vick, et al.
On the Structure of Phoneme Categories in Listeners With Cochlear Implants
J Speech Lang Hear Res, February 1, 2007; 50(1): 2 - 14.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JSLHRHome page
P. E. Souza and K. T. Boike
Combining temporal-envelope cues across channels: effects of age and hearing loss.
J Speech Lang Hear Res, February 1, 2006; 49(1): 138 - 149.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.