AJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Audiology Vol.1 63-67 March 1992.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by King, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Sininger, Y. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by King, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Sininger, Y. S.

Electrode Configuration for Auditory Brainstem Response Audiometry

A. Joyce King 1 and Yvonne S. Sininger 1

1 Electrophysiology Laboratory, House Ear Institute, Los Angeles

A vertical recording montage (Cz to the seventh cervical vertebra or C7) has been shown to yield significantly lower auditory brainstem response (ABR) threshold when compared with a horizontal or anterior-posterior montage (Sininger & Don, 1989). The present study further examines the relationship between electrode placement and the amplitude of the ABR to low-level stimuli. Four electrode arrays were compared—the commonly-used clinical configuration of forehead to ipsilateral mastoid, the vertical array from the previous study (Cz to C7), and two additional montages employing linked mastoids as reference to either the vertex or forehead electrode. ABRs were recorded simultaneously in four channels in response to 8000 click stimuli at 10, 20, and 30 dB SL from 9 male and 9 female adult subjects with normal hearing. The effect of electrode channel was significant at <.0001, with the vertical channel revealing the largest wave V amplitudes at all stimulus levels. Female subjects, as expected, produced larger ABR amplitudes than male subjects in all recording conditions, but electrode-channel effects were independent of gender.

Key Words: ABR, electrode, montage

Submitted on July 30, 1991
Accepted on December 13, 1991







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.