AJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Audiology Vol.1 48-55 November 1991.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oviatt, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Kileny, P. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Oviatt, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Kileny, P. R.

Auditory Event-Related Potentials Elicited From Cochlear Implant Recipients and Hearing Subjects

Dana L. Oviatt 1 and Paul R. Kileny 2

1 Feldman & Oviatt, Audiology Services, Syracuse, NY
2 University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI

Auditory event-related evoked potentials (ERP) were recorded from 10 cochlear implant recipients and 10 age-matched hearing subjects using an oddball paradigm in which frequently occurring tone bursts of 500 Hz were interspersed within rarely occurring tone bursts of 1000, 2000, or 3000 Hz. Signals were delivered acoustically to both groups of subjects through a loudspeaker. P-300 peak latencies for the implant recipients were significantly longer than those for the hearing subjects for the 500–1000 and 500–2000 Hz frequency contrast conditions, but not for the 500–3000 Hz contrast condition. For the hearing subjects, P3 latency did not change significantly across the three frequency contrast conditions; however, for the implant recipients, P3 latencies were significantly longer for the 500–1000 Hz signal contrasts than for 500–2000 and 500–3000 Hz signal contrasts. These results suggest that although implant recipients had more difficulty than hearing subjects in discriminating the 500–1000 and 500–2000 Hz contrasts, the implant recipients and hearing subjects discriminated the widest 500–3000 Hz frequency contrast equally well. The ERP appears to be a reliable index of signal detection and discrimination in cochlear implant recipients and consequently may be useful for device programming and for monitoring the progress of these individuals.

Key Words: deafness, cochlear implants, cognitive, event-related potentials, P300, discrimination

Submitted on July 9, 1991
Accepted on August 23, 1991







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1991 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.